|
|

Strängnäs is about 35 miles west of
Stockholm. It is the probable
birthplace of Johan Anderson Stålkofta. |
Perhaps inspired by the riches
other Great Powers gathered from their overseas colonies, Sweden too
sought to extend its influence to the New World. In 1637, Swedish, Dutch
and German stockholders formed the New Sweden Company to trade for furs
and tobacco in North America. Under the command of Peter Minuit, the
company's first expedition sailed from Sweden late in 1637 in two ships,
Kalmar Nycke and Fogel Grip. Minuit had been the governor of the Dutch
colony, New Netherland, centered on Manhattan Island, from 1626 to 1631.
|

Peter Minut |
The ships reached Delaware Bay
in the spring of 1638, and the settlers began to build a fort at the site
of present-day Wilmington, Delaware. They named it Fort Christina in honor
of Sweden's child queen. It was the first permanent European settlement in
the Delaware Valley.
During the next seventeen
years, thirteen more Swedish expeditions left the homeland for New Sweden.
All but one expedition survived the voyage. A total of eleven vessels,
several more than once, and 600 colonists safely reached their
destination. The colony eventually consisted of farms and small
settlements along both banks of the Delaware River into modern Delaware,
New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Maryland.
New Sweden rose to its greatest
heights during the governorship of Johan Printz (1643-1653). He extended
settlement northward from Fort Christina along both sides of the Delaware
River and improved the colony's military and commercial prospects by
building Fort Elfsborg on the New Jersey side of the river, to seal the
Delaware against English and Dutch ships. He built Fort Korsholm, a
trading fort, at the mouth of the Schuylkill River to deny Dutch fur
trading on the west side of the river. Despite these steps the colonists
lived peacefully with their Dutch and Lenni Lenape neighbors.
In 1654, the colony's last
governor, Johan Risingh, succeeded Johan Printz at a time when the
Governor-General Peter Stuyvesant ruled the Dutch capitol of New
Amsterdam. Immediately upon arriving in New Sweden Governor Risingh
foolishly attempted to remove the Dutch from the colony by seizing Fort
Casimir (Dutch), downstream of Fort Christina on the western shore of the
river at present-day New Castle, Delaware. With little ammunition and no
gunpowder, the Dutch garrison of Fort Casimir surrendered without a shot.
It was re-named Fort Trinity.
New Netherlands Governor
Stuyvesant mounted an invasion the following summer when seven armed Dutch
ships carrying 317 soldiers appeared on the Delaware River. Realizing that
resistance would be useless the vastly outnumbered Swedes surrendered Fort
Trinity. Fort Christina and the entire colony were surrendered by Governor
Risingh two weeks later.
Our first Stalcop ancestor was
deeply involved in the affairs of New Sweden. It was immediately after his
falling under Dutch rule that the Stalcop family was begun. Christina
Carlsdaughter arrived some months after the surrender on the last ship
sailing from Sweden in support of the colony. She was soon to be the bride
of Johan Stålkofta.
Swedish sovereignty over New
Sweden was at an end, but the Swedish presence was very much in evidence.
Governor Stuyvesant permitted the colonists to continue as a “Swedish
Nation” and allowed them to be free to be governed by a court of their own
choosing, practice their own religion, organize their own militia, take
title to their land holdings and continue trading with the native people.
This independent “Swedish Nation” continued even after the Dutch lost out
to the English in 1664 under the Duke of York until 1681 when another
Englishman, William Penn, received his charter for Pennsylvania and the
three lower counties, the present-day Delaware.
The colonist and their
descendants continued to reside in the former New Sweden Colony area until
just a few years before the start of the Revolutionary War. Then a general
exodus from the former New Sweden Colony took place. Not only the Stalcop
family but the majority of the original New Sweden settler families moved
out of the area.
|

NEW SWEDEN IN AMERICA
The majority of the Stalcop
family resided in the immediate area of Fort Christina during the first
century of the family in America. |
During the exodus the Stalcop
family split between two different migration routes. One group went west
toward the Ohio River and points westward. The other group went south into
North Carolina with members of later generations heading in the general
direction of Texas. The promise of free, or very cheap, land was the lure
for both groups.
|
BRIEF HISTORY OF NEW SWEDEN IN AMERICA |
|
JOHAN ANDERSSON från Strängnäs (John, the
son of Andrew, from Strängnäs), the
primogenitor of the entire Stalcop family,
arrived alone in the Colony of New Sweden in
1641 as a young boy or lad about age 13. He
had taken a job as a farm hand to work on
the tobacco plantation the Colony intended
to be located at Upland (now Chester, PA).
By age 19 he gave up farming and became a
soldier. He soon acquired a nickname, or
early form of soldier’s name, Stålkofta, the
Steelcoat, to separate him from other men
named Johan Andersson.
The following is provided to give some
background to the origin of the Stalcop
Family in America. |
|
THE HAZARDS OF 17TH CENTURY TRAVEL
THE FATE OF THE CAT
|
The neighbor of Johan Andersson Stålkofta, TIMEN STIDDEM of Gothenburg,
Sweden, a barber-surgeon for the New Sweden Colony and his family were
aboard the ship “CAT”. Stiddem’s first wife and children all perished in
the incident.
The following is quoted from the Pennsylvania Magazine of
History and Biography, Volume 8, p. 28-32.
____________________________________________________________
| "On
the 24th of March, 1649, Queen Christina issued orders to the
College of the Admiralty to "make ready and equip" the ship Kalmar
Nyckel, then lying at Gottenburg, consigned to the West India
Company for the removal of "the cargo, which the Company had stored
there." She was to be supplied with the necessary crew, and twenty
pieces of cannon, and furnished with provisions for ten months,
deducting the amount which the Company might claim from the
Admiralty, and was to start upon her voyage as soon as possible.
Finding she could not be prepared in time, the College of the
Admiralty ordered, April 13, the equipment of another vessel called
Katlan (the Cat), on which embarked the eighth expedition to New
Sweden. The cargo consisted principally of materials of war and
implements of every sort, from the inventory of which we may cite "
two six-pounder brass cannon, two three-pounder, twelve six-pounder,
and two four-pounder iron cannon, powder, lead, grenades, muskets,
pistols," etc., besides rope and tackle, and everything needed for
the outfit of a ship, with a considerable supply of food. Commandant
Hans Amundsson was appointed head of the expedition, and Cornelius
Lucifer captain of the vessel. The former was accompanied by his
family. Among the emigrants (who numbered seventy persons), we may
name, particularly, the preacher Matthias Nertunius (Rosenbechius?)
and the bookkeeper Joachim Lycke; some criminals, also, appear to
have been included. Seeing that no fewer than three hundred Finns
applied to the government this year for permission to go to New
Sweden, there was probably no lack of colonists on this occasion.
After a long delay at Gottenburg, the ship set
sail on the 3d of July. At first the voyage was prosperous, and on
the 20th of August she touched at the island of Antigua in the West
Indies to take in water. Not obtaining enough here, she steered next
day to St. Christopher's, where the emigrants were received with
great kindness by the Governor, and supplied with water and
provisions. She procured salt at the island of St. Martin, and the
following day coasted about some others in that unfamiliar sea, the
captain, "ex mala prcESumtione," says the narrator, "ac incredibili
obstinacia" bearing full sail, in spite of admonitions of the
Commandant and other companions to lie to. Early on the morning of
the 26th she struck a rock, two miles from an island fourteen miles
distant from Porto Rico; but, after she had been lightened of
ballast, water, etc., she was brought to shore, fortunately, without
loss of life. The victuals and a great part of the stores of the
ship were carried to the beach, and, after some repairs, she was
ready to continue her journey. The shipwrecked mariners, needing
water, besought assistance of the inhabitants, who happened to be
Spaniards, and who sent them water, indeed, but, observing their
desperate situation, plundered them of what they had carried ashore,
and took them on boats, as prisoners, to Porto Rico, where Amundsson,
who meanwhile had recovered his sword, was brought before the
Governor, Don Fernando de la Riva. The latter, after questioning him
as to his intentions, from whence he came, and whither he was going,
made excuses for the violence towards his company, saying, this
would not have occurred, had he been present. Amundsson considered
they would have to answer for behaving as they had to friendly
strangers. In the mean time the emigrants were liberated, and
permitted to leave the place as they found opportunity; but, being
robbed of their ship and private property, they had to work to
support themselves, or beg for sustenance. The Commandant was
furnished by the Governor with a small monthly allowance to maintain
himself and family.
Amundsson communicated these facts to his
superiors in Sweden; but, some time necessarily elapsing before the
news could be received and aid arrive, his company were grievously
afflicted. Being forbidden to celebrate their form of religious
worship, many through sickness and necessity, others by promises and
force, and some through matrimonial alliances were converted to the
Catholic faith, by which means their lot was somewhat improved. The
Governor himself procured the baptism of one of the Swedish women,
and took her to live with him. Soon after he left the island. Others
of the shipwrecked people eagerly sought means to get away, and
especially the crew of Kattan, who time and again appealed to La
Riva to send them home. Lest their arrival in Sweden, in their
forlorn plight, might discredit the colonial enterprise of the West
India Company, the Swedish Commandant persuaded them to dispatch
Joachim Lycke (who was accompanied by the preacher Nertunins), and
wait a year for orders or assistance. This they agreed to,
therefore, but, the year expiring without news, many finally left
the island, one by one, getting home in various ways.
Many, however, remained behind. Presently
arrived a new Spanish governor for Porto Rico, Don Diego de la Vera,
who, not hearing of any Swedish ship destined to remove the
strangers, whom he either would not or could not maintain or help,
especially without orders on the subject from his government,
determined that all should leave the island. In expectation of this
the Swedes assembled to sail with a General Francisco Visante.
Nevertheless, directly contrary to promise and agreement, only
Amundsson and his family were permitted to accompany the officer.
The former besought that he might stay upon the island, if his
people might not go with him, but was compelled, by menaces, to
remain upon the ship. His children were forcibly detained by the
people left upon the beach, and had to be seized by Spanish Boldiers
and conveyed on board the vessel, which afterwards (probably April
13,1651) set sail for Spain, where they arrived the following July.
From Cadiz Amundsson wrote a letter to the Swedish agent at
Amsterdam, Peter Trotzig, to be forwarded to Sweden, but this
communication never reached its destination. Notwithstanding, he
succeeded in getting to that city, in a destitute condition, and,
procuring the needful documents, wrote to the Swedish Ambassador,
Matthias Palbitzsky, at Madrid, desiring him to speak to the Spanish
government, and obtain help for the distressed Swedes at Porto Rico.
After the departure of Amundsson his people
petitioned the Governor for aid to leave the island, and were told
they could purchase a little "bark," that came there a few days
before, and was taken as a prize. This they did, then, and, La Vera
furnishing them with provisions, quitted Porto Rico, May 1, 1651,
numbering no more than eighteen souls. Their design was to get to
New Sweden, if possible, but the very next day, off Santa Cruz (St.
Croix), they were captured by a frigate, which compelled them to
accompany her to that island, then in the possession of France. The
Governor met them with some soldiers on the beach, and, immediately
taking them into custody, robbed them of their money and what other
valuables he could discover. The women having sewed some of these in
their clothes, the Governor, by some means, finding this out, on
their refusal to give them up, "had them taken one by one, and,
screwing their fingers with pistol-locks until the nails came off,"
forced them to yield what was concealed, and even went further with
his tortures in the hope of getting more. The rest were heavily
laden with iron fetters and ill-treated, and two of them were killed
in a most horrible manner. Finally, they were distributed in various
quarters of the island, to work, being prohibited to have
intercourse with one another under penalty of death. In the course
of a few weeks nearly all succumbed to misery and disease.
Meanwhile, a Dutch captain, who was sailing in these waters,
happened to hear of their misfortunes, and contrived to send a boat
from St. Christopher's, to bring the wretched people away. At that
time there were only five alive, the mate, Johan Jonsson Ruth, two
women, and two children, of whom all but the first-named person
died, either on the voyage or immediately after their arrival at
that island. Ruth, the sole survivor, was brought by the captain
spoken of to Holland, where he found opportunity to send a letter to
Sweden, reciting the events we have narrated.
This expedition, therefore, accomplished
nothing for the Swedish colony, and the report of its ill fate,
which reached the settlers in the summer of 1650, could not but have
depressed their spirits, and increased the difficulty of Governor
Printz's situation."
|
When he was hired in 1640 to go to New Sweden his
starting salary was set at 10 R.D. (Riksdalers per year) and he was
advanced 10 dalers copper money just prior to sailing. This advancement of
pay, probably in hard currency, was not typical. Only a relatively few of
the colonists to receive a salary advancement. Most received nothing at
all. At the time one Riksdaler was worth about two and a half dalers
meaning that his annual starting salary was 25 dalars. His hefty 40
percent advancement on his first year salary was probably paid so that he
could buy supplies for his journey and things that were not likely to be
available in New Sweden.
It is nearly impossible to determine the equivalent value of what he was
paid in terms of today’s money. Suffice it to say that as a very young,
about age 13, farm laborer it probably was equal to a minimum wage. For
comparison the pay of the priest serving the colony was set at 10 dalars
per month or twelve times his rate of pay.
Johan Andersson probably received the 10 dalers copper money advancement
in the form of copper coins called an Öre. See the photo on the PICTURES
page. In general at the time thirty-two of the smaller öre coins made up
one daler. These 10 dalers, or 320 Öre, paid and likely spent in Sweden,
was the only Swedish money Stålkofta was ever paid. This strange fact
became highly significant years later when New Sweden was surrendered to
the Dutch.
In July of 2004 Hans Ling of Uppsala, Sweden kindly provided this
explanation.
“Öre is a Viking pronunciation of the Latin word “or”. It was a
measure of gold. Until the meter system was introduced it was often used
to tell the size of land. A farm could consist of, for instance, an amount
of land valued at 10 Öre. In the 1500s the value of a Öre
had decreased so that it was possible to make coins with the value of one
Öre. As the devaluation continued other coins were introduced such
as the mark and daler. In the 1700s it was decided that the
Swedish coins should only be the riksdaler (national daler) and the
skilling (change). One riksdaler was 48 skilling. In
the beginning of the 1800s the riksdaler was renamed to krona
(crown) and the skilling replaced by a new öre. One krona
is 100 Öre. Today (mid-2004) one Öre is of so little value
that the smallest coin is 50 Öre”.
The operating primus of the New Sweden Colony was the classic “Company
Store” model. Everyone who went to the colony was expected to deal only
with the Company. The colonists were forbidden to privately trade with the
natives, the Dutch or the English. Needless to say there was a lot of
backdoor trading going on anyway. The Company owned everything. The use of
everything; land, tools, farm animals, etc., was on a rental basis and
could only be rented from the company.
No money was sent over to pay wages and salaries. To receive pay each
person had first to return to Sweden and then to petition the company for
his back pay. Of course, anything purchased or rented from the Company
Store, either aboard ship coming or going, or while in New Sweden, was
carefully recorded and deducted from any pay earned. Settlement often was
a long delayed process, years in some instances, as the company waited
until the books were returned from New Sweden.
This currency system, or total lack of, was based upon the assumption that
all jobs in New Sweden were temporary. That is, that everyone, including
the settlers were simply Company employees and all would eventually return
to Sweden. It was not considered that anyone would make the colony into a
permanent home.
Depending on which bookkeeper was making the record entries in the company
books were kept either in terms of Dutch or Swedish money. Dutch
bookkeepers translated everything into terms of Dutch guilders. Later,
back in Sweden, the accounts were re-translated back into Swedish
currency. Dutch guilders were the only hard currency actually in
circulation in the New Sweden area. For trade there seems to have been at
least three prevalent mediums of exchange, Dutch guilders, sewant and
beaver pelts. Some years later tobacco and grain was added to the list.
Sewant is more widely known as wampum or Indian money. It was strings of
small, white cylindrical beads. The Printz 1646 to 1653 account books show
his bookkeeper was Swedish and the amounts are given in Swedish
riksdaler terms. This record begins when Stålkofta became a soldier
and ends when Printz returned to Sweden.
At the Dutch invasion Stålkofta had long since left farm work and had
become a soldier. He had advanced rapidly in rank to that of Gunnery
Sergeant. He had a similar rapid advancement in pay up to a salary of 144
Riksdalers per year.
Since Johan Andersson Stålkofta, like most, elected to remain in America
under Dutch rule and never returned to Sweden it follows that he never
received any hard currency pay for his fourteen years of service. The only
exception was the 10 dalers he was advanced in Sweden, and surely spent in
Sweden, just before he went aboard ship to begin his journey to the New
World. Being a young boy this advanced money may have been the only
Swedish money he ever held in his hands.
It follows that when he returned to Fort Christina in 1655 at the
surrender he was again in a very poor financial condition. His assigned
house and his garden at Bee Island, actually both owned by the Company,
was reported by Governor Risingh both badly damaged if not completely
destroyed. His employment as a Swedish soldier had just come to an abrupt
end. The entire Company Store purchase/charge system no longer existed.
Governor Risingh threats to hold all the officers serving at Fort Trinity
responsible for the loss of the entire colony made it unsafe for him to
return to Sweden to petition for his pay.
He must have realized that he would never receive any of his back pay.
Stålkofta, and everyone else, were suddenly flat broke and faced with
having to do business on a cash basis in the Dutch currency system. What
was he to do?
Well, from the wreckage of his house he managed to salvage several pieces
of furniture, a table and a wardrobe. He quickly sold them, and perhaps
other items, to a Dutch sergeant to raise immediate cash. Maybe some of
the others colonists facing the same dilemma did the same. These two
pieces of furniture were soon to be in the center of an argument between
the Dutch sergeant and the new Dutch Vice-Governor which is why we know
about the sale.
Governor Risingh also had a money problem. He had no money in his pocket
for his return to Sweden. Having lost the entire colony he surely knew he
would have a difficult time trying to collect his pay. He did not have a
Swedish ship to use on the return trip but that was not a worry. By treaty
arrangement the Dutch paid all travel expenses for everyone returning to
Sweden, including the Governor, and the trip was made on a Dutch ship.
Risingh could not take with him any of the company property, the supplies
on hand, or any of the goods he had available for trading with the
Indians. He held a “Going Out of Business” sale to get rid of the goods
and stores of the colony.
Johan Andersson Stålkofta was one of the largest purchasers of these goods
during the sale. Stålkofta surely realized that if he could never receive
his back pay then he would never actually have to pay for any of the items
he purchased. They were simply being charged to his pay account that would
never be settled. One of the items he purchased was the entire stock of
shoes, forty plus pairs. One could speculate Stålkofta probably
immediately resold most of these goods, probably to Dutch soldiers, to
raise money.
The ‘Going Out of Business Sale’ idea did not work out well for Risingh
because it did not produce a single öre of cash for him. Risingh then did
something no one else in New Sweden could do. He wrote a secret article,
No. 10, into the surrender treaty. He took out a loan from the Dutch by
putting up the nine cannons from Fort Christina as collateral. The loan
amount, 300 Pounds Flemish, was to be repaid within six-months. This was
an impossible condition because no one could travel to Sweden and return
to New Sweden with money within the six months. The loan could have been
repaid in Amsterdam but this was not done and even if it were paid in
Amsterdam notice of the payment could not reach Stuyvesant before the due
date. Stuyvesant dutifully foreclosed on the loan and moved the Fort
Christina cannons to New Amsterdam about seven months after the surrender.
An interesting side of this story is that apparently Risingh was very
successful in keeping the entire article, and the loan money, very secret
in Sweden. It apparently was not among the documents he arrived home in
Sweden with when he returned. In accordance with the terms in the Secret
Article Risingh and his bookkeeper were put ashore in England and the two
traveled together overland from where they landed to London. This
apparently was to exchange the draft Stuyvesant had given him for the 300
Pounds Flemish. From London the two men traveled to Amsterdam. From there
Risingh went to northern Europe to make his report on the loss of New
Sweden to the King. The bookkeeper went directly to Sweden.
So far no mention in Sweden has been found of the document containing the
Secret Article (See Gehring, NYHM 18:19), or any record of anything
relating to Risingh mortgaging the weapons of Fort Christina. Likewise
there is no record of what Risingh did with the money he collected except
that it appears he clearly did not turn it over to the Company.
It is difficult to accurately determine the present day value of the loan
money Risingh collected in London but one estimate put the amount at
approximately $860,000.00. The amount he split with the bookkeeper is
unknown.
While the available records do not directly address the currency problem
the New Sweden settlers faced after the surrender it is clear they adapted
quickly and thrived in the Dutch monetary system. Having title to their
own property and being able to trade directly with the Indians and with
English and Dutch traders surely made life easier for them. By the time
the 1693 Census was conducted, less than forty years later, the population
of New Sweden had nearly tripled.
The patronymic naming system - the name of the
father - was used in all of Scandinavia and most
of northern Europe. The system added sen, son,
datter, dotter, or dottir to the name of the
father. It formed a patronymic name. A person
named Johan Andersson was literally "John, the son
of Anders (Andrew)." Christina Carlsdotter was
literally, "Christina, the daughter of Carl
(Charles)." Because of this system there could be
many people living in the same place at the same
time with the same name who were completely
unrelated to each other. Seven different Johan
Anderson’s have been identified as being
associated with the New Sweden Colony. There were
two more who were Dutch. The sons of all of them
would be “Johansson’s” but would be related to
only their siblings but not to the sons of the
other men.
The patronymic naming system is very different
from what we're used to and Americans are prone to
forcing them into being English style surnames.
The system was the best for the times and for the
culture. Because of the short life expectancy it
was rare that three generations in a family were
living at the same time. Most given names were
chosen to honor either a Biblical figure or an
older member of the family hence lots of names
were repeated generations after generation.
Scandinavian females did not assume the name of
their husband when they married. They carried
their maiden name for life. If you find an Olof
Andersson and a Christina Andersdotter married to
each other she is not "Mrs. Olof Andersson" in the
traditional American sense. The record simply
means that Olof was the son of an "Anders", and
Christina was the daughter of an "Anders" and they
were unrelated before their marriage.
Record keepers recorded what their ears heard and
they spelled what they heard the way they thought
it should be spelled in their own language. In the
case of New Sweden three different languages,
Swedish, Dutch and English, were heard and spelled
each in its own way. A Dutchman trying to use the
English language wrote out Johan Anderson
Stalcop’s Will. The spelling of Swedish patronymic
and the phrasing he used has a decided Dutch
influence.
The Swedes followed the laws of the government in
control so after William Penn took over the naming
system was ordered changed. The English surname
system came into use among the New Sweden settler
families after about 1682. A person could chose a
surname to be known by out of thin air, their
father's nickname, patronymic or perhaps a trade
mentor's name. Rarely was it a place name. Some
families split with some family members taking one
surname and others taking a different surname.
In Sweden the patronymic system gave way to
surnames about 1880.
Every family has myths
made up about their past and we are not an exception. More than a usual
number seems to be associated with our origins so this is presented to
shatter some of them. They serve only to waste a lot of valuable research
time and miss-lead those not inclined to verify such stories. Sorry if I
take away some of your favorite colorful stories but I think the true
origins are far more interesting than these made-up and erroneous myths.
THE
SEACOOK MYTH
In
1846 historian Benjamin Farris published his History of the Original
Settlements on the Delaware. In it he included a story about the
origin of the Stalcop family name. Farris said that the founder of the
Stalcop family was a Dutchman who worked for his passage to the new world
as a cook aboard a Dutch ship. He wore a woolen cap that he often used as
a towel. The cap was supposed to have been so saturated with grease that
it took on the look of polished steel. The greasy woolen cap made the
seacook the butt of jokes with the Dutch sailors. They supposedly called
the seacook 'Staelkappe', meaning ‘steel head’ or ‘steel cap’.
Farris' Dutch seacook story is colorful and seems logical which probably
accounts for its ready acceptance. This story has spread far and wide all
across the country. Lawrence Dillon (LD) Stallcup repeated it in his 1937
outline of the family only changing the seacook to a Swede aboard a
Swedish ship. The story is still widely quoted to this day.
The
Dutch seacook/greasy cap story is completely false! Farris simply made it
up in 1846. It has no basis in fact.
The
first Stalcop was not Dutch. He did not arrive in America aboard a Dutch
ship and he was not a seacook. The Dutch seacook story does
not relate in any manner to the origin of the Stalcop family or the family
surname. Farris' complete fabrication is supported only by his own
imagination. Farris' false story has been repeated and passed on, and even
worse, it has been believed by entire generations of Stalcops. Exactly a
century after Farris fabricated his seacook story Harry G. Staulcup
completely demolished it in his 1946 thesis for his Masters Degree from
the University of Delaware. This thesis, Notes on the Early Stalcop
Family, has not received wide distribution, at least not nearly wide
enough to stop the spread of the false Dutch seacook/greasy cap story.
PARENTS OF
JOHAN ANDERSSON
In the
early twentieth century some family researchers found a couple in the
area, Anders Andersson the Finn, and his wife Christina Coolbrant, who had
a son named John Andersson alias Cock (cook). In an effort to force this
younger John Andersson into becoming the founder of the Stalcop family and
to fit into the false Dutch sea cook story they changed Anders Andersson
into a Dutch spelling, Andres Andriessen, and invented birthdates for the
couple that are at least 30 years too early. Anders Andersson the Finn,
and his wife Christina Coolbrant, are not, and never have been, related in
any way to the Stalcop family. Pietter Stallcop sued Anders Andersson and
won his case. The court judgment was settled by a transfer of 390 acres of
land from Anders to Pietter.
THE
GOLD-LACED UNIFORM
The
story about Johan Andersson Stålkofta wearing a gold-laced uniform about
town to impress the ladies is a complete and very modern invention. This
story dates back only to 1940. It was published in a book called THE
DELAWARE by Henry Emerson Wildes.
|
“Johan Anderssen, a
gunner nicknamed Stalkofta, or the Steelcoat, and John Coleman,
wirepuller from behind the scenes, were members of the inner circle.
Each had secret motives. Just as Armegot (Armegot Printz, daughter
of Governor Johan Printz) wished to recover Big Belly's (Johan
Printz) brewery and to regain his pleasure yacht, so Anderssen and
Coleman, none too successful farmers, coveted the estates of
Englishmen. The Steelcoat, it was whispered, looked lecherously at
lovely ladies and dallied with the thought that he could have a
harem. His trim, gold-laced uniform, especially designed to set off
his best features and to divert attention from a certain physical
peculiarity, was always glittering where the women of the colony
were wont to congregate. It was, in fact, his longing for the wives
of other men that first caused his fellows to band together for the
overthrow of Jacobsen's intrigue." |
Johan
Andersson Stålkofta never wore any sort of uniform, military or otherwise.
None of the Swedish soldiers in his era wore a uniform any sort. Arm
scarves of distinctive colors were used to identify troops.
There
are a large number of errors in Wildes invention. It was Hendrick
Coleman, not John Coleman, involved. The phrase, 'wirepuller' probably
would not have been used at the time since metal wire was nearly unknown
in the colony. It is hard to imagine that Armegot Printz could have the
'secret motives' ascribed to her. Governor Printz's account books are
extant. There is no mention of a brewery lost by her father and commercial
breweries did not exist in the colony at the time. Governor Printz did not
own a pleasure yacht. Such things did not exist in the colony.
The
only place in the Colony where ladies ever gathered was at weddings,
funerals and for Church services. The Church had wardens to make sure
everyone behaved themselves inside and outside. Stålkofta's son John was a
warden. The wardens were the community police force and had arrest
powers.
|

Swedish Army
Museum diorama of soldiers of the period getting ready to go into battle.
Not a uniform in sight. Only the pike men have helmets.
|
|
HERALDRY MYTH SHATTERED
No Coat of Arms - No Family Crest - No Meaning
|
|
From time to time commercial companies appear and use very carefully
crafted generic stories about a family coat of arms or a family
crest. They say, for a price, they will tell you the origin (or
history) of your family and the meaning of your family name and will
supply you with the family Coat of Arms and Family Crest. Their way
out of such a grossly inaccuracy come-on is that they never actually
claim that anything they tell you is true. They only say that it
‘may’ be the story. They never state that anything they say is
actually true.
They are in the business of selling brick-a-brac and their sales
gimmick is they will apply a fictitious Family Crest or fictitious
Coat of Arms to just about anything if you are will to pay their
price for their brick-a-brac.
As it states on the Group Lineages Page the Stalcop family, and all
associated spellings, did not originate in a foreign country. The
family surname was created in America and has never existed anywhere
outside of America. There is never been any heraldry of any sort
associated with the family. There is no background of royalty, no
coat of arms, no family crest. None of that has ever existed in the
Stalcop family.
The written name “Stalcop” has no meaning in English or any other
language. Because of how the family surname was derived it is merely
a transliteration, or approximation, of the spelling of the sounds
of the name as it passed through several other languages into
Colonial English and then on into American English. The only place
it has any meaning is in the parent language as it existed, not
today, but over three and a half centuries ago in early colonial
days.
Simply stated the Stalcop Family is All AMERICAN.
|
|
THE DAUGHTER
THAT NEVER WAS
Larry S. Stallcup |
Christina Stalcop, supposedly a daughter of the first family and
married to William Cobb of Philadelphia, never existed. Dr. Peter
Craig and I, Historian of the Swedish Colonial Society, had many
long discussions about her that spanned years until I finally
convinced him that she did not exist.
First of all there simply was not a birth slot in Johan Andersson
family for this mythical daughter to be born. Either that or she had
to be a twin. Twins are very rare in the Stalcop family. Before I
managed to convince Dr. Craig that Cobb’s wife was not a Stalcop he
had incorrectly assigned the name of Christina Stalcop as the wife
of William Cobb to the Gloria Die charter member list and published
it in two books and a newletter article.*
William Cobb attended a wedding at Timen Stidham’s home and he later
gave a court deposition about an argument involving Christina
Carlsdotter that took place at the wedding. The argument was about a
bonnet stolen from Christina Carlsdotter. From William Cobb’s
deposition Dr. Craig concluded that William Cobb, not Stidham, was
the groom and was marrying the mythical Stalcop daughter in the
Stidham home because her parents had disowned her. Dr Craig believed
William Cobb to be an Englishman and not Lutheran but he turned out
to be Lutheran and a charter member of the Gloria Dei Lutheran
Church. Dr Craig assigned the name Christina to his mythical wife
simply because there was no other daughter named Christina in Johan
Andersson Stalcop's family.
Later court documents proved that the wedding William Cobb attended
was Timen Stidham's third wedding, not William Cobb's wedding. There
were, in fact, two weddings involved in the stolen bonnet argument
separated in time by about six months. The first wedding, and
argument, was in the Stalcop household and the second was in the
Stidham househod. The court records finally convinced Peter he had
it wrong but by then it was too late. The books and articles had
already been published. This is one of the very few times Dr. Craig
was wrong about anything at all to do with the New Sweden settlers.
It is not know whom William Cobb married but it was not a daughter
of Johan Andersson Stalcop and Christina Carlsdotter. Cobb’swife may
have been named Christina, at that time a very popular female name
in the community, but she was not a member of the Stalcop family.
_______________________________________________________________
* The 1693 Census of the Swedes on
the Delaware, Peter Stebbins Craig, SAG Publications, 1993
Swedish Colonial News, Volume 2, Number 1, Winter 2000, Charter
Members of Gloria Dei Church, Peter Stebbins Craig.
Colonial Records of the Swedish Churches in Pennsylvania, Vol. One,
The Log Churches at Tinicum Island and Wicaco, 1646-1696, Peter
Stebbins Craig and Kim-Eric Williams. 2006
|
NOVEL DISCOVERY
Thanks
to our cousin, Hans Ling, an exciting recent discovery has come to light.
While it has not been all that far back in time, only about three quarters
of a century, it was written a continent away and in a different language
making it obscure in America. Please keep in mind that the following
discussion concerns a Swedish language novel, a complete work of fiction.
Some, but not all, of the characters are fictional. The real persons
mentioned are doing fictional things. On the other hand the setting for
the novel, the New Sweden Colony, is quite accurate. Johan Printz was
Governor of the New Sweden Colony from February 15, 1643
to October 1653.
* * *
* * * * * * * * * * *
The
following report is from e-mail messages exchanged between Hans Ling and
Larry Stallcup. A wonderful Christmas present for all Stalcops.
December 15, 2008
Dear
Larry,
A
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to both of you. In 1932 Maths
Holmström published a novel for children/teenagers with the title Lasse
Stålkofta, berättelse från Nya Sverige (Lasse Stålkofta, a tale from New
Sweden). The book is very rare. I have not been able to find it elsewhere
that at The Royal Library in Stockholm, the Dioceses Library in Skara and
the municipal library in Umeå. You may not borrow it from Stockholm and
Skara, but I have today asked the municipal library here in Uppsala to
order the book from Umeå. Let us see what happens.
Hans
(Ling of Uppsala, Sweden)
December 22, 2008
Dear Larry,
Now I
have got the book Lasse Stålkofta – Berättelse från Nya Sverige I have not
read it, and I doubt that I will ever do it. The story is about the young
man Lasse Stålkofta who has come to New Sweden with his parents Anders
Stålkofta and his wife. Her name is never told. She is just called “mother
Stålkofta”. Some of the Swedes have hidden away from Printz around
Schokill River and Printz has heard that they plan to conquer a ship and
become pirates. He sends Lasse to spy at them and find out what is going
on. After a lot of adventures among the bandits and the Indians Lasse
finds a cave where Indians have been buried long ago and where he finds a
box filled with gold coins. After still more adventures he can return to
his parents as a rich man. He falls in love with Kristina Printz and
together they go to Sweden to start a new life with all the money.
Obviously Maths Holmström has found it fun to write the book. He has also
written long songs he says were used in New Sweden and also some poems
connected to the text. And the characters talk in different dialects from
the time. Also he seems to have studied New Sweden rather well and tries
to give a correct historic surrounding to his story.
But
the book has nothing [to do] with the real Stålkoftas. Holmström has just
found the name and got fond of it. It modern Swedish the name sounds funny
because stål/steel and kar/cardigan are two so very opposite things.
I
attach illustrations from the book.
Hans
(Ling of Uppsala, Sweden)
|

The illustration on
page 98 shows Governor Printz giving the spying assignment to Lasse.
Governor Printz says: I have called you here because I wanted to
have an important discussion with you.
Page 163 shows
Lasse when he returns. The caption says: When they discovered
they were alone Kerstin threw her arms around Lasse Stålkofta's neck
and kissed him. |
|

Page 179.
Lasse returns to his parents home after his mission for the
Governor. The caption says “Lasses” shouts Mother Stålkofta
and runs toward her son with outstretched arms.
Page 191.
The caption says “Their (Mats Pipare & Lasses Stålkofta's) canoe was
well hidden in a small creek by reeds and overhanging trees.” |
December 28, 2008
Dear Larry,
I have
now had a little closer look in the book about Lasse Stålkofta. His
father Anders has a very poor farm in Småland and heard about the
possibilities to get a better life in New Sweden. He emigrated with his
family on Kalmar Nyckel. One son died but his wife Barbara, son Lasse and
daughter Gertrud who came over. At first Anders worked at a tobacco
plantation at Christina, but after some time he got his own farm at New
Upland. Lasse became friends with the Indians after having saved the life
of White Falk, who was attacked by a bear.
Later
he won a competition in wrestling between different tribes arranged by
Johan Printz. He defeated the strongest Irokes (I do not know if that is
the correct English name for the tribe) Hissing Snake and was then by his
friends the Lanape given the name Strong Panther. After a lot of
adventures together with his friend Mats Pipare (piper) during his job to
spy on the deserters and bandits he went back to Sweden on Gyllene Hajen.
Standing on the deck hand in hand with Kerstin Printz he saw New
Gothenburg disappear. Her eyes were wet by tears thinking of Mats Pipare
who had been killed by Hissing Snake. That was the end of the book.
I have
tried to find out something about the author Maths Holmström and been
asking about him. Perhaps when I can get some information I will let you
know.
Hans
(Ling of Uppsala, Sweden)
HOW
MANY STALCOPS?
Back about 1980
when Earl E. Jones was wrapping up his monumental Stalcup Family record he
estimated he had recorded 95 percent of all Stalcops. The missing 5
percent were almost all living in 1980 but did not provide information to
be recorded. Earl documented slightly over 9600 of us at that moment
meaning there probably were about ten thousand Stalcops by 1980.
Twenty-eight years, or more than a full generation, has passed since Earl
made his count. In the normal course of events population tends to double
each generation. That means you have about twenty thousand, or more,
cousins running around. Consider this. All Stalcops everywhere
today are grandchildren of Johan Anderson Stålkofta and Christina
Carlsdaughter. Boy, that is a lot of grandkid’s names and birthdates to
remember. And that is only the ones named Stalcop.
WHAT IS NORMAL?
As time passes and community circumstances evolve so
do the standards of normal behavior. When Johan Anderson Stålkofta was
born the normal life expectancy was about 48 years. Unless he was a member
of the royalty or the clergy his formal education ended at about age
twelve. At that age he was expected to leave home, find a job, and fend
entirely for himself. That is probably why, all on his own, he took a job
as a farm laborer in the New Sweden Colony across a vast ocean. Hard to
imaging kids of today conforming to that standard of normal behavior.
Once he arrived in New Sweden he faced some other
norms we today probably would find equally as far outside of the realm of
possibility. Here are a few:
Men tended to marry first at about age 30 to 33 years
old and have only one wife. Stålkofta was about age 29 or 30 when he
married. Girls tended to marry first at age 14 to 16, most outlived their
first two husbands and died at about the same time as their third husband
died.
Christina Carlsdaughter is listed as a child on the
ship’s passenger list during the voyage to New Sweden but married within a
few months of arrival. Half a century later Rev. Björk was 33 when he
married Christina Stalcop. She was 14 when he proposed and 16 when they
married in 1702. Christina underwent two years of intense education before
the marriage to prepare her to enter the social status of the clergy. The
clergy was second only in status to Royalty.
Wives did not inherit anything from their husbands.
Her children could literally throw her out of the house if they wished as
soon as their father died. A husband could, however, provide for his wife
until her death or until she remarried if he wished. He had to write such
provisions into his Will. Unmarried daughters were usually provided for in
their father’s Will. Married daughters, on the other hand, were considered
the responsibility of their husband so were often not mentioned in their
father’s Will. Stålkofta did not mention his eldest daughter by name in
his Will but did leave property in her husband’s, Lylof Stiddem, name.
All too often family researcher of
today try to interpret past events using current norms. Always a grave
mistake.
|
TRAGIC STALCOPS
|
|
So far only two serious criminals are known in the Stalcop family.
Both paid the ultimate price for their crimes. There have been
lots of others that committed lesser crimes of one sort or another
but for the most part the crimes were not of a violent nature.
|
EDWARD STALCOP
|
|
In 1803 Edward
Stalcop came home and found his wife in bed with his cousin, Asa
Mounts. He let his anger overcome his good judgment and used his
rifle to shoot and killed Asa Mounts. About fifteen months later
he was hung for murder in Chillicothe, Ohio. Edward Stalcop was
the first person executed in Ohio.
It is believed his wife remarried about one week after Edward
died. Edward’s children later moved to Wisconsin and on the way
they changed ancestry. They magically became Germans fresh off the
boat. Apparently once they arrived in Wisconsin it made no
difference that none of them could speak German. All could speak
English and that was a more important skill in the community. |
|
|
A GRIM PLACE FOR A WEDDING
|
Not all weddings are preformed in glorious settings. This Stalcop wedding
was reported in the Baltimore Sun
newspaper in 1897. |
LOVE AT FIRST SIGHT
Gertrude Stalcup. Who Escaped from the House of Refuge, Secures
Final Release by Marriage |
|
Gertrude Stalcup, who, in company with Olivia Granruth, escaped from the Female House of Refuge January 6, was married to Edward Abt Saturday
Night at the institution by Rev. Richard Schmidt, pastor of Peace German Lutheran Church, on Gough street, near Washington street. She was returned
to the institution early last week from the eastern police district.
Her companion, Olivia Granruth, was married before being recaptured to Wm. Wyatt, captain of an oyster boat, and is now living with him.
The marriage of Gertrude Stalcup to Mr. Abt was brought about by Attorney William P. Noonan, who was engaged by Mr. Abt to get his sweetheart out of the institution for that purpose. Mr. Noonan secured the license and, in company with the groom and the minister, went to the
institution. Superintendent Bibb readily consented to the ceremony being preformed after he was satisfied that the groom was a suitable person for the girl to marry.
After the ceremony Mr. and Mrs. Abt went to the home of the groom, 329 Eastern Avenue, where they will in future reside. Abt is a driver for a coal and wood firm and bears a good reputation. He did not know the girl until she went to the house, where he was boarding after she had escaped
from the House of Refuge, and he states that he immediately fell in love with her. |
|
|
IN THE WRONG PLACE
Mountain Meadows, Utah 1857 |
Charles
Stallcup (1832-1857) - Married to
Winnie Wood and living in Marion County, Arkansas. Father of two
young children, Rachel and James. Mother and children stayed at
home when Charles Stallcup set out on a journey to California with
brother-in-laws William and Solomon Wood. The three men were
thought to have been hired to help care for the large cattle herd
that was accompanying a wagon train. Their plans were to check out
the prospects in California.
William Edward Wood (1831-1857)
- Born in Arkansas to George Washington Wood and Nancy Jane
Coker, Wood was married to Manerva Jane Hudson about 1850. The
couple had one small child and Manerva Jane was pregnant with
their second child. Solomon R. Wood (1937-1857) was the younger
brother of William Edward Wood, and brother-in-law of Charles
Stallcup. He was not married.
All three men died at Mountain Meadows, Utah in September, 1857.
They appear to have simply been in the wrong place.
The so-called Mountain Meadows massacre has been the subject of
150 years of spin doctoring and cover-ups. Nearly a dozen years
passed before any sort of inquiry was undertaken. The reports are
nearly all hearsay and speculation. It is impossible to know what
may have actually happened.
Mormons had undergone years of intense persecution. Faithful
Mormons had moved west to Utah to escape that persecution. For a
decade the Utah Territory existed as a theocracy led by Brigham
Young and was located outside of the boundaries of the United
States. Young established settlements along the California Trail
and Old Spanish Trail. Mormon leaders had been mustering militia
throughout Utah Territory to defend themselves against raids and
arracks. In 1857 the United States Army was to be sent into Utah
to establish US authority. The Army let it be known, true or not,
that it was to be a full-scale hostile invasion and military
attack on the Mormon population. From July to September 1857
Mormons prepared. The people were required to stockpile grain and
were enjoined against selling food and grain to wagon trains.
Brigham Young also sought to enlist the help of Indian tribes in
fighting the "Americans".
In early 1857 a group of emigrants from northwestern Arkansas
started toward California. They were soon called the Fancher party
after their leader. They went through Salt Lake City but were not
sold any food or grain. The wagon train had been joined by a group
who called themselves "Missouri Wildcats," whom reportedly
taunted, vandalized and "caused trouble" for Mormons and Native
Americans all along the route. The Fancher train was alleged to
have poisoned a spring near Corn Creek, Utah.
Some accounts say they were taunting Mormons saying they had the
gun that "shot the guts out of Old Joe Smith" (the founder of the
Mormon Church). A few months earlier, popular Mormon leader Parley
Pratt was murdered in Arkansas and authorities refused to charge
the killer. Stories of Pratt's murder had begun to arrive in Utah.
The Fancher party continued to Mountain Meadow, a widely known
stop over, where they found water and fresh grazing for their
livestock.
Some accounts say the Fancher party decided to raid the nearby
Mormon farms and settlements for fun. Another account says the
wagon train was then attacked and besieged by Paiute Indians. They
are reported to have encircled and lowered their wagons, wheels
chained together, along with digging shallow trenches and throwing
dirt both below and into the wagons, to made a strong barrier.
(This was not a spur of the moment defense. It would have taken
many hours to accomplish. It may indicate the Fancher party was
expecting retaliation from an attack they had made.)
Supposedly on September 11, 1857, two Mormon militiamen approached
the Fancher party wagons with a white flag and were followed by
Indian agent and militia officer John D. Lee. Lee is reported to
have told the emigrants that he had negotiated a truce with the
Paiutes whereby they could be escorted safely the 36 miles to
Cedar City under Mormon protection in exchange for turning all of
their livestock and supplies over to the Paiutes. Accepting this,
the emigrants were led out of their fortification (It is difficult
to believe the wagon train emigrants would suddenly give up their
weapons and everything they owned and just walk out among their
attackers on the word of someone they had never seen before.) The
report says a signal was given and the Mormon militiamen escorts
turned and executed the male members of the Fancher party standing
by their side. (This is beyond belief. The Mormons are an
exceedingly gentle people that live by the Bible. How they could
suddenly find many cold-blooded murderers is very hard to
believe.)
John D. Lee was the only person charged. It was said that he was
charged only because someone had to be charged as part of the US
Army’s coverup. After two trials he was finally found guilty. He
was taken to Mountain Meadows and executed.
The Mountain Meadows event put an end to the attacks on Mormon
people simply because they were Mormons. All the fun goes out of
persecution if the persecuted fight back. Charles Stallcup and his
Woods brothers-in-law were at the wrong place when an historic
turning point was reached.
VIRGIL STALCUP
Virgil Stalcup was a Depression era robber who ran up a very long list of
petty crimes before he was caught. He reportedly had sentences that
totaled 254 years in jail if served consecutively. His cellmate, Clarence
Brown, had amassed 66 years in sentences.
Brown's wife smuggled the gun into the jail but it was Virgil Stalcup that
used it to shoot and killed the Dickens County, Texas sheriff, Oct 27,
1934. Brown and Stalcup then escaped from the jail, stole the sheriff's
new Ford V8 car and drove out of the county. Later they stole another Ford
car and ran the sheriff’s car into a river in an attempt to hide it. They
soon had every police officer in Texas looking for them. It was the
largest manhunt in Texas history. Brown and Stalcup split up and went
separate ways but both were caught after about three weeks on the run.
Brown’s wife was sentenced to two years in jail for smuggling in the gun.
In court the man who traded the gun to her described it as “a .45 single
action thumb-buster”. It was a big, heavy revolver. Brown had another 99
years added on to his sentence. Virgil Stalcup was found guilty of
first-degree murder and was sentenced to be executed. The sentence was
appealed to the Texas Supreme Court and was upheld.
Virgil Stalcup died in the Texas electric chair, May 4, 1936, about
nineteen months after he shot and killed the sheriff.
In 2000 the sheriff, W. B. "Bill" Arthur, had a memorial marker
dedicated to his memory by the Dickens County Texas Historical Commission.
He is the only peace officer ever killed in the line of duty in Dickens
County, Texas.
Published: October 12, 2009 3:00 a.m.
Steuben stroke
victim vanishes
Silver Alert out; he has diabetes but no insulin |
Holly Abrams The Journal Gazette, 600 w. Main Street,
Fort Wayne, IN 46802
A Silver Alert was issued Sunday afternoon for a man who went missing from
his family’s Steuben County lake home the same day. Meanwhile, his family
said they have few answers as to why 48-year-old Stuart Stalcup went
missing. Stalcup disappeared from his family’s home along Snow Lake in
Fremont between 12 and 6 a.m. Sunday, authorities said.
Stalcup is 5-foot-8 and weighs 160 pounds. He has balding dark hair and
green eyes. He was last seen wearing a plaid flannel shirt, blue jeans and
a blue and yellow vest. He was last seen traveling on foot, according to
Steuben County sheriff’s deputies. Stalcup, of Wichita, Kan., has been
living in Fort Wayne with his parents since suffering from a stroke in
December, said his father, Robert Stalcup. The family was staying at their
lake home in Fremont this weekend, he said.
The last time they saw their son was at bedtime Saturday night, Robert
Stalcup said. His son, who has severe diabetes, was scheduled to eat
breakfast and take an insulin shot at 6:30 a.m. Sunday.
When Robert awoke, his son was missing from his bedroom. The family does
not suspect any type of entry to the home – saying Stalcup left on his own
accord. He does not have insulin with him, Robert Stalcup said. Robert
Stalcup said the family does not know why he would leave or where he went.
“I don’t know for sure if he has identification on him,” he said,
adding that “it would be a little difficult for him to convey where he
lives. Stuart Stalcup, who had not been found as of 10 p.m. Sunday, has a
speech impairment, his father said.
The Silver Alert system mirrors the current Amber Alert system for
missing children. Activated in July, the Silver Alert covers adults with
dementia who go missing – along with anyone else considered to be an
endangered adult. That could be someone incapable of returning without
assistance because of a mental illness, mental retardation or another
physical or mental incapacity. High-risk missing people, those who require
medical attention, are also covered under Silver Alerts.
Authorities have launched a mounted search and rescue and a K-9 search to
try to find Stalcup. Anyone with information on Stalcup’s disappearance
should call deputies at
260-665-3131.
Stuart Stalcup's body was found a week or so after the alert. I have never
met them and was not aware anyone with the last name of STALCUP/Stalcop
was in our area here in northeastern Indiana (the little village of
Fremont is about 30 or so miles from where I live). This area is about 10
to 15 or so miles from both Ohio and Michigan and is the far north
east corner of Indiana. Have you any contacts from that area? I noticed
they also used the U like your family line.
Larry E. Baker
610 East Hill St
Garrett, IN 46738
[descendant of Maria (Stalcop)
SMIDT/SMYTH the daughter of 2nd generation Pietter Stallcop]
STALCUP VS. STALCUP SLANDER SUIT
We
are grateful to Stephen J. Stalcup of Greenwood, Indiana for these
stories. Isaac Stalcup, Sr (1765-1841) was a brother to our ancestor Peter
Stalcop (1763-1835), both being sons of William Stalcop (1741-1819) This
slander suit involved brothers, two of Isaac Stalcup, Sr’s sons.
CIRCUIT
COURT - GREENE COUNTY, INDIANA
FEBRUARY 1823 TERM
We may think of pioneer days
as very different from the litigious environment of advertising lawyers we
live in today. The following story shows that human nature hasn’t changed
much.
“Isaac
Stalcup, Jr. and Polly, his wife, (plaintiffs) complain of
James Stalcup and Margaret, his wife, (defendants) in custody do
in an action and the cause. For that whereas the said Polly is a
good, true, honest, chaste, and faithful citizen of the State of
Indiana, and as such from the time of her nativity hitherto, hath
behaved and carried herself and during all that time hath been held
esteemed and respected of good name, fame, behavior and character
and free from all vices of Larceny and from all suspicion of
committing such crimes, by reason whereof said Polly the love and
affection of her said husband and the favor, good will and esteem of
all her neighbors and others to whom she was known deservedly did
acquire and gain. Nevertheless, the said Margaret, not being
ignorant of the premises, but contriving and maliciously intending
the said Polly, not only of her good name, fame, credit and esteem
to deprive, but also the same Polly infamies and scandalous amongst
her neighbors aforesaid to render and also the same Polly to bring
into the dangers of the penalties of the laws of this State made
against those who commit Larceny.
Declare on the first day of December in the year of our Lord one
thousand eight hundred twenty two at County Circuit and State
aforesaid within jurisdiction of this Court, the false, feigned,
infamous, malicious and scandalous following of said Polly in the
presence and hearing of the said Isaac Stalcup, and of other good
and worthy citizens of this State maliciously and unjustly did say,
speaking with a loud voice proclaim in public, to wit, “ She
(meaning the said Polly) took my shift” (meaning the said shift of
the said Margaret) and stated it and that “She (meaning the said
Polly) was a thief and that Isaac Stalcup (meaning said Isaac)
upheld her (meaning the said Polly) in it.” Meaning that Polly is
guilty of Larceny.
And whereas also said Margaret. Out of her further malice and made
to effectually injure and aggrieve the said Polly and her good name,
credit and reputation to deprive afterwards, heretofore to wit on
the same day and year last aforesaid at the County Circuit and State
aforementioned and within the jurisdiction of the Court, in certain
other discourse then and there had in the presence and hearing of
aforesaid good and worthy citizens of this State of and concerning
the said Polly other false, feigned, scandalous, malicious and
defaming words in English in the presence and hearing of said
citizens with a loud voice did openly publish falsely, wickedly and
Maliciously utter the substance and to the effect the following, to
wit: “Polly Stalcup (meaning said Polly) is a thief (meaning said
Polly) she stole my shift (meaning the shift of said Margaret)”
meaning that said Polly is guilty of Larceny.
And whereas also the said Margaret out of her further malice and
more effectually to injure and aggrieve said Polly and her good
name, fame, credit and reputation to deprive afterwards, therefore
to wit on the same day and year last aforesaid at the County Circuit
and State aforesaid in certain other discourse then and there had
with the aforesaid good and worthy citizens of the State of and
concerning the said Polly, there and then false, feigned,
scandalous, malicious, and hearing of said citizens, with a loud
voice did openly and publicly, falsely, wickedly and maliciously
utter, pronounce and declare of and concerning the said Polly in
substance and to the effect the following, to wit: “ You (meaning
the said Polly) are a thief.” “You (meaning the said Polly) stole my
shift.” Meaning thereby that the said Polly is guilty of Larceny. By
means of the speaking and publishing of which said false and
scandalous words the same Polly not only in her good name and fame
aforementioned is grievously hurt and injured; but also the same
Isaac and Polly in performing their lawful business are much the
worse. To the damage of said Isaac and Polly two-thousand dollars
and therefore they bring suit.”
|
|
WITNESSES SUMMONED FOR THIS TRIAL
Thomas Osburn & Polly Osburn
John Craig & Wife
Thomas Stalcup & Elizabeth Stalcup
Alexander Craig
John Wilson & Wife
Elmer Craig
John Davis
Eli Adams
Benjamin Hashaw |
The March 1823 Term of the
Greene County, Indiana Circuit Court was presided over by W.W. Wicks,
with Martin Wines, Associate Judge. Thomas Warnick, Clerk;
John Lemon, Sheriff; and Smith Elkins, Prosecuting
Attorney, also served.
After being continued and delayed until all of the witnesses could be
brought into court, the case was tried during the May 1824 Term, before
Judges Jacob Call, Thomas Bradford, and Martin Wines. The
Jury selected for this case included Elias Crance, Morris R. Barnet,
Peter Herrington, John Kelly, William Buckles, John Baty, James
Johnston, John Hill, John Van Vorst, Robert Bailey, John Mason, and
William Bland.
After a long and laborious trial spanning seven days the Jury was given
case.
|
|
The Jury awarded the Plaintiffs a payment of six
cents. |
|
The outcome of this case, a six-cent judgment for a
two thousand dollar claim for a damaged reputation, reflects the relative
standing of these two sons of pioneer settler Isaac Stalcup, Sr in the
community.
|
“James Stalcup, probably
born in Sumner County Tennessee, from whence he married Miss
Margaret Mar[t]lin, an Irish lady. They came to Greene County in the
year 1818, and settled on the hill just east of where Worthington
now stands. He established the first blacksmith shop in this
neighborhood. Mr. Stalcup afterwards moved over on the east side of
White River, and lived there fifty years. He made the best axes and
Cary plows of any blacksmith in Greene County. He also built the
first [brick] house in the county.....James Stalcup and wife had
eight children--three boys and five girls.....He died at the age of
eighty-six years and is buried on the old homestead farm....” |
Isaac Stalcup Jr. was not such a pillar of the
community.
|
“At all elections and
general musters, the candidates must and did treat the people to
whiskey’ and when they succeeded in getting up a big fight at any
place here, big Isaac Stalcup Jr and Benjamin Stalcup [another
brother] were in it....”
It is said that Mr. Stalcup was a drinking man and a widower,
having sold his first wife to another man for a new fur hat and
ten gallons of whiskey. This first wife that was supposedly sold
for whiskey and a new fur hat would be the Polly Craig Stalcup
whose honor was deemed worth six cents in the 1824 Slander Case.
Isaac Stalcup and Polly Craig were issued a marriage license on
September 18, 1816 in Harrison Co., Indiana.
“The first weddings in this locality [Highland Township, Greene
Co. IN], included Isaac Stalcup Jr. and Miss Mournen Martin. The
man and woman then floated down White River in a water craft...” |
Isaac Stalcup Jr. is virtually
invisible in subsequent years, not appearing in any Greene County Census
enumeration, even though he is supposed to have lived there until his
death in 1872.
During the same May 1824 Term of
the Greene County, Indiana Circuit Court which heard the Slander case,
the following indictment was issued for Isaac Stalcup, Jr.
|
State of
Indiana
vs.
Isaac Stalcup
Indictment for Assault and Battery on Henry Martin
|
The Grand
Jurors for the State of Indiana come and are sworn to inquire in
and for the body of the County of Greene at the May term of the
Greene Circuit Court held in the year of our Lord Eighteen hundred
and twenty-four. In the name of, by and under the authority of the
State of Indiana upon their oath present that Isaac Stalcup of the
said County, did on the tenth day of July in the year of our Lord
Eighteen hundred and twenty-three with force and affray at the
County aforesaid did therein come upon one Henry Martin in the
Peace of the State of Indiana, then and there being an assault did
make on the said Henry Martin then and there beat, wound and treat
contrary to the form of the Statute in such case made and
provision and against the Peace and dignity of the State of
Indiana. Abel Burlingame, Foreman of Grand Jury.
|
Smith
Elkins
Prosecuting Attorney
Greene County
|
|
The outcome of this indictment is unknown.
Mary
Stalcup Markward
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Mary R. Stalcup Markward, born February 10, 1922, died
November 23, 1972 [1] in Silver Springs, MD, was for seven years a
member of the Washington, DC "District Communist Party" as director
of the party's membership. She was a beauty shop operator but
actually was working undercover for the FBI. [2]
Biography
She
was born as Mary R. Stalcup to Maria and Benjamin Stalcup.
[3] Benjamin Stalcup worked as a government bookbinder. She lived in
Fairfax County, Virginia and was recruited by the FBI in 1943, just
a week after her wedding. Her husband, George A. Markward
(1912–1969), had been sent to Europe to fight in World War II. She
was working in a beauty shop on Massachusetts Avenue. [2][4]. She
may have been approached to spy because several of her clients were
thought to be Communists by the FBI. Her daughter believed that her
mother's essay written about her pride in being an American brought
her to the attention of the FBI. The essay was published in a local
Virginia paper. [2] Markward worked undercover for almost seven
years, a time that was stressful for her because she was shunned by
friends and family because of her activities with the Party. [4][5]
Markward testified before the House Committee on Un-American
Activities on July 11, 1951 that Annie Lee Moss and about 240 other
people were Communist party members. [5] She provided the names of
their spouses and gave the exact dates of party meetings. While her
memory of membership and Party activities was largely accurate,
Markward did not provide evidence that the Communist Party had any
strength in the DC area. At one point in her testimony, she even
joked about the Party's inability to recruit young, new members. In
the list of members she did provide, there appeared to be a
connection between Party membership and Civil Rights activism;
several people whom Markward accused were less involved with
communism and more concerned with picketing segregated areas of the
city. Her accusation of Annie Lee Moss is the most remembered; Moss
categorically denied membership or collusion with Communists,
despite Markward's confirmation of Moss' address and registrations
with the party. Later historical accounts show Moss did have some
interest in social justice, belonged to a cafeteria workers' union,
and may have had friends who took her to leftist meetings. [8]
Mary Stalcup Markward contracted multiple sclerosis early in her
life—the primary reason she left the service of the FBI. FBI
officials refused to acknowledge her later on, and went so far as to
tax retroactively the income she received as an undercover agent.
Her daughter has called herself and her mother patriots who
supported the US government, but she admits that the FBI could have
treated her better after she came forward. She died on November 23,
1972 in Silver Spring, Maryland at age 50. [1][6] She was buried in
Baltimore National Cemetery.[7]
References
1 - "Mary Markward, FBI Informant, Dies.". Washington Post. November
25, 1972. "Mary Stalcup Markward, a
beauty shop operator who became an FBI
informant and identified more than 200 persons as Communists during
congressional hearings in the early 1950s,
died of heart failure Thursday at her home in Silver Spring,
Maryland.
She was 50."
2 - "Pointing the Way in the Hunt for Communists.". Washington Post.
July 5, 1999. Retrieved 2007-09-25. "Mary
Stalcup Markward appeared nervous as she
made her way into the cramped hearing room on the morning of
July 11, 1951. ..."
3 - 1930 US Census with Stalcup in Fairfax, Virginia
4 - "Woman Tells of Outwitting Reds In Seven Years as Agent for
F.B.I.". New York Times. July 7, 1951, Saturday.
Retrieved 2008-03-11. "Mrs. Mary Stalcup
Markward, 29-year old former beauty shop worker, told today how
she worked for nearly seven years as an
undercover agent for the Federal"
5 - "F.B.I. Woman Limns Hard Lives of Reds. Agent Discloses
Communist Party Tactics.". New York Times.
July 12, 1951, Thursday. Retrieved
2008-03-11. "A Communist's life is not a happy one, the House
committee on
Un-American Activities was told today by a
young woman who had spent almost seven years as a rank-and-file
member of the party while an undercover
agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation."
6 - Social Security Death Index; Mary Markward; b. 10 February 1922
- d. November 1972
7 - "Mary S. Markward". Findagrave. Retrieved 2008-03-12.
8 - "Witness Insists Officer was Red. Thierman Belonged to Party if
She Processed His Card, Ex-F.B.I. Woman Says."
New York Times. May 2, 1953, Saturday.
Retrieved 2008-06-21. "Mrs. Mary Stallcup Markward, a former
undercover agent for the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, asserted today it would "not be even remotely
possible"
for her to have processed the Communist
party application card of Lieut. Sheppard Carl Thierman without his
already having been accepted as a member."
|
|
JESSE STALCUP - FELL OFF WAGON |
Benton Co., Arkansas
Rogers Democrate newspaper Aug 23, 1917
Jesse Stalcup, 20-year old son of J. W. Stalcup died
yesterday morning after a very brief illness at the home of his
father in the north part of town. It is understood that death was
the result of a rupture of a blood vessel, the result of a fall
from a dray wagon on which he had been working. He had lived here
many years and his death was a great shock to the many friends and
relatives.
Benton Co., Arkansas Obit of Jesse Stallcup:
Rogers, Democrate newspaper Aug 30, 1917
Jesse Stallcup: Funeral services for Jesse Stallcup,
20 year old son of John W. Stallcup, who died August 2,
1917 were held last Thursday afternoon at three o'clock at the
home of his father and were conducted by Rev. C. A. Rogers.
Interment was in the Rogers Cemetery. Among those who came to
attend the funeral were a brother, Nim Stallcup of Kansas City,
and two sisters, Mrs. Malissa Stallcup Skaggs of Gravette and Mrs.
Minnie Stallcup Brown of Fayetteville.
|
SUICIDE BY POLICE
FRANK CREWS, Deputy Sheriff,
Killed in the line of Duty. Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma,
Sheriff's Office. |
About 9 P.M. on Saturday night, September 5, 1953, Deputy Crews
and Undersheriff A. I. Rutherford went to the Denham Hotel at
Ninth and Union in Shawnee concerning a man pulling a gun on
another man. As the officers approached the west entrance to the
hotel they were met by 75-year-old Jess Stalcup, coming out
of the hotel. The officers stopped him and questioned him about
the incident. While they were talking to Stalcup, the
complainant, Mr. Ewers, came out of the hotel and indicated to the
officers that Stalcup was the man with the gun.
Stalcup then drew a concealed .45 automatic pistol and
emptied it toward the officers. Deputy Crews was hit four times in
the stomach and side. Rutherford and two bystanders were also
wounded but not as seriously. Rutherford shot Stalcup three
times in the neck and chest. Both Deputy Frank Crews, 54, and
Jess Stalcup, 75, died at the scene. Deputy Crews was survived
by his wife.
From: http://www.oklemem.com/C.htm
Thomas Virgil
Stallcup
Born
January 3, 1922, died May 2, 1989) was a professional baseball
player, a shortstop who played in seven Major League seasons
(1947-53). Nicknamed "Red," the native of Ravensford, Swain
County, North Carolina, threw and batted right-handed, stood 6
feet 3 inches tall and weighed 185 pounds.
Stallcup attended Clemson University. He was originally
signed by the Boston Red Sox before World War II, and was selected
by the Cincinnati Reds in the Rule 5 draft after the 1946 season,
when Stallcup batted .304 in the Class B Piedmont League. After
his debut with the Reds on April 18, 1947, he was sent to the
Jersey City Giants for seasoning, and he responded by hitting .338
with 15 home runs in 76 games. From 1948-51, Stallcup was
Cincinnati's starting shortstop, but he never batted higher than
.254. He twice hit eight home runs in a season. During the 1951
season, he lost his regular job to 21-year-old Roy McMillan. The
following May, he was traded to the St. Louis Cardinals, where he
ended his Major League Baseball career as a utility infielder.
Overall, Stallcup batted .241 with 22 home runs in 587
games.
He briefly managing in minor league baseball then left the game.
He died at age 67 of a self-inflicted gunshot wound in Greenville,
South Carolina.
|